OutOfTreeModules

Extending GNU Radio with own functionality and blocks

This article borrows heavily from the original (but very outdated) &quot;How to write a block?&quot; written by Eric Blossom.

What is an out-of-tree module?
An out-of-tree module is a GNU Radio component that does not live within the GNU Radio source tree. Typically, if you want to extend GNU Radio with your own functions and blocks, such a module is what you create (i.e. you wouldn't usually add stuff to the actual GNU Radio source tree unless you're planning to submit it to the devs for upstream integration). This allows you to maintain the code yourself and have additional functionality alongside the main code.

A lot of OOT projects are hosted at CGRAN -- the Comprehensive GNU Radio Archive Network. CGRAN projects are all available through our tool PyBOMBS. In fact, when you add your project to the PyBOMBS recipe repo, it will automatically update the CGRAN website.

For example of such a module is the GNU Radio Digital Audio Broadcasting module, which extends GNU Radio with everything needed to get audio from DAB and DAB+. When installed, you have more blocks available (e.g. in the GNU Radio companion) which behave just like the rest of GNU Radio; however, the developers are different people.

Tools and resources at my disposal
There are a couple of tools, scripts, and documents that are available as 3rd-party programs or as part of GNU Radio.

gr_modtool - The swiss army knife of module editing
When developing a module, there's a lot of boring, monotonous work involved: boilerplate code, makefile editing, etc. gr_modtool is a script which aims to help with all these things by automatically editing makefiles, using templates, and doing as much work as possible for the developer such that you can jump straight into the DSP coding.

Note that gr_modtool makes a lot of assumptions on what the code looks like. The more your module is custom and has specific changes, the less useful gr_modtool will be, but it is probably the best place to start with any new module or block.

gr_modtool is now available in the GNU Radio source tree and is installed by default.

Developer resources on the wiki
Most important is definitely the block coding guide. While this is written for the GNU Radio main tree, this should also be applied to all modules. Specifically, have a look at the naming conventions!

CMake, make, etc.
GNU Radio uses CMake as a build system. Building a module, therefore, requires you to have cmake installed, and whatever build manager you prefer (most often this is 'make', but you could also be using Eclipse or MS Visual Studio).

Tutorial 1: Creating an out-of-tree module
In the following tutorials, we will use an out-of-tree module called howto. The first step is to create this module.

With gr_modtool, this is dead easy. Just point your command line wherever you want your new module directory (this should be outside the GNU Radio source tree!), and go:

% gr_modtool newmod howto Creating out-of-tree module in ./gr-howto... Done. Use 'gr_modtool add' to add a new block to this currently empty module. If all went well, you now have a new directory called  in which we will work for the other tutorials.

Structure of a module
Let's jump straight into the gr-howto module and see what it's made up of:

gr-howto % ls apps cmake  CMakeLists.txt  docs  examples  grc  include  lib  python  swig It consists of several subdirectories. Anything that will be written in C++ (or C, or any language that is not Python) is put into. For C++ files, we usually have headers which are put into  (if they are to be exported) or also in   (if they're only relevant during compile time, but are not installed later, such as   files. You'll see what that is in the next tutorial).

Of course, Python stuff goes into the  directory. This includes unit tests (which are not installed) and parts of the Python module which are installed.

You probably know already that GNU Radio blocks are available in Python even if they were written in C++. This is done by the help of SWIG, the simplified wrapper and interface generator, which automatically creates glue code to make this possible. SWIG needs some instructions on how to do this, which are put into the  subdirectory. Unless doing something extra clever with your block, you will not need to go into the  directory; gr_modtool handles all of that for us.

If you want your blocks to be available in the GNU Radio companion, the graphical UI for GNU Radio, you need to add descriptions of the blocks and put them into. Prior to version 3.8 these descriptions were XML files, but from 3.8 onward they use YAML instead.

For documentation,  contains some instructions on how to extract documentation from the C++ files and Python files (we use Doxygen and Sphinx for this) and also make sure they're available as docstrings in Python. Of course, you can add custom documentation here as well.

The  subdir contains any complete applications (both for GRC and standalone executables) which are installed to the system alongside with the blocks.

The directory,  can be used to save (guess what) examples, which are a great addendum to documentation because other developers can simply look straight at the code to see how your blocks are used.

The build system brings some baggage along, as well: the  file (one of which is present in every subdirectory) and the   folder. You can ignore the latter for now, as it brings along mainly instructions for CMake on how to find GNU Radio libraries etc. The CMakeLists.txt files need to be edited a lot in order to make sure your module builds correctly.

But one step at a time! Now, let's move on to our next tutorial.

Tutorial 2: Writing a block (square_ff) in C++
For our first example, we'll create a block that computes the square of its single float input. This block will accept a single float input stream and produce a single float output stream, i.e., for every incoming float item, we output one float item which is the square of that input item.

Following the naming conventions, the block will be called  because it has float inputs, float outputs.

We are going to arrange that this block, as well as the others that we write in this article, end up in the  Python module. This will allow us to access it from Python like this:

import howto sqr = howto.square_ff

Creating the files
First step is to create empty files for the block and edit the CMakeLists.txt files.

Again,  does the job. On the command line, go to the  directory and enter:

gr-howto % gr_modtool add -t general -l cpp square_ff GNU Radio module name identified: howto Block/code identifier: square_ff Language: C++ Please specify the copyright holder: Enter valid argument list, including default arguments: Add Python QA code? [Y/n] Add C++ QA code? [y/N] Adding file 'square_ff_impl.h'... Adding file 'square_ff_impl.cc'... Adding file 'square_ff.h'... Editing swig/howto_swig.i... Adding file 'qa_square_ff.py'... Editing python/CMakeLists.txt... Adding file 'howto_square_ff.xml'... Editing grc/CMakeLists.txt... On the command line, we specify that we're adding a block, its type is 'general' (because we don't know what block types are, yet) and it is called. The block should be created in C++ and it currently has no specified copyright holder (by default, gr-module author is the copyright holder). then asks you if your block takes any arguments (it doesn't, so we leave that empty), whether or not we want QA code for Python (yes, we do) and for C++ (no, we don't right now).

Now, have another look at the different CMakeLists.txt files and see what  did. You can also see a lot of new files, which now have to be edited if we want the block to work.

Test Driven Programming
We could just start banging out the C++ code, but being highly evolved modern programmers, we're going to write the test code first. After all, we do have a good spec for the behavior: take a single stream of floats as the input and produce a single stream of floats as the output. The output should be the square of the input.

How hard could this be? Turns out that this is easy! So, we open, which we edit to look like this:

from gnuradio import gr, gr_unittest from gnuradio import blocks import howto_swig as howto

class qa_square_ff (gr_unittest.TestCase):

def setUp (self): self.tb = gr.top_block

def tearDown (self): self.tb = None

def test_001_square_ff(self): src_data = (-3, 4, -5.5, 2, 3) expected_result = (9, 16, 30.25, 4, 9) src = blocks.vector_source_f(src_data) sqr = howto.square_ff dst = blocks.vector_sink_f self.tb.connect(src, sqr) self.tb.connect(sqr, dst) self.tb.run result_data = dst.data self.assertFloatTuplesAlmostEqual(expected_result, result_data, 6)

if __name__ == '__main__': gr_unittest.run(qa_square_ff, &quot;qa_square_ff.xml&quot;)

For Gnuradio v 3.9 and up, use the following. from gnuradio import gr, gr_unittest from gnuradio import blocks try: from howto import square_ff except ImportError: import os   import sys dirname, filename = os.path.split(os.path.abspath(__file__)) sys.path.append(os.path.join(dirname, "bindings")) from howto import square_ff class qa_square_ff(gr_unittest.TestCase): def setUp(self): self.tb = gr.top_block def tearDown(self): self.tb = None def test_instance(self): # FIXME: Test will fail until you pass sensible arguments to the constructor instance = square_ff def test_001_square_ff(self): src_data = (-3, 4, -5.5, 2, 3) expected_result = (9, 16, 30.25, 4, 9) src = blocks.vector_source_f(src_data) sqr = square_ff dst = blocks.vector_sink_f self.tb.connect(src, sqr) self.tb.connect(sqr,dst) self.tb.run result_data = dst.data self.assertFloatTuplesAlmostEqual(expected_result, result_data, 6) # check data

if __name__ == '__main__': gr_unittest.run(qa_square_ff, "qa_square_ff.yaml")

gr_unittest is an extension to the standard Python module unittest. gr_unittest adds support for checking approximate equality of tuples of float and complex numbers. Unittest uses Python's reflection mechanism to find all methods that start with test_ and runs them. Unittest wraps each call to test_* with matching calls to setUp and tearDown. See the Python unittest documentation for details.

When we run the test, gr_unittest.main is going to invoke setUp, test_001_square_ff, and tearDown, in that order.

builds a small graph that contains three nodes. will source the elements of  and then say that it's finished. is the block we're testing. gathers the output of.

The  method runs the graph until all the blocks indicate they are finished. Finally, we check that the result of executing  on   matches what we expect.

Note that such a test is usually called before installing the module. This means that we need some trickery to be able to load the blocks when testing. CMake takes care of most things by changing PYTHONPATH appropriately. Also, we import  instead of   in this file.

In order for CMake to actually know this test exists,  modified   with these lines:

For GR v3.9+, remove the following

include(GrTest)
 * 1) Handle the unit tests
 * 1) Handle the unit tests

set(GR_TEST_TARGET_DEPS gnuradio-howto) set(GR_TEST_PYTHON_DIRS ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/swig) GR_ADD_TEST(qa_square_ff ${PYTHON_EXECUTABLE} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/qa_square_ff.py)

The C++ code (part 1)
Now that we've got a test case, let's write the C++ code. All signal processing blocks are derived from  or one of its subclasses. Go check out the block documentation on the Doxygen-generated manual.

already provided us with three files that define the block:,   and. All we have to do is modify them to do our bidding. After you've finished with this tutorial please read and understand the Blocks Coding Guide to find out how these files are structured and why!

First of all, we have a look at our header files. Because the block we're writing is so simple, we don't have to actually change them (the header file in  is often quite complete after running , unless we need to add some public methods such as mutator methods, i.e., getters and setters). That leaves us with.

hints at where you have to change code by adding  symbols.

Let's go through these one at a time:

square_ff_impl::square_ff_impl : gr::block(&quot;square_ff&quot;,                 gr::io_signature::make(1, 1, sizeof (float)), // input signature                  gr::io_signature::make(1, 1, sizeof (float))) // output signature {       // empty constructor } The constructor itself is empty, as the squaring block has no need to set up anything.

The only interesting portion is the definition of the input and output signatures: At the input, we have 1 port that allows float inputs. The output port is the same.

void square_ff_impl::forecast (int noutput_items, gr_vector_int &amp;ninput_items_required) {     ninput_items_required[0] = noutput_items; }  is a function which tells the scheduler how many input items are required to produce   output items. In this case, they're the same. The index 0 indicates that this is for the first port, but we only have one any way. This is generally the case for  in a lot of blocks. For examples, you can look at how,  ,  , and   define the default forecast functions to account for things like rate changes and history.

Finally, there's, which is pure virtual in  , so we definitely need to override that. is the method that does the actual signal processing:

int square_ff_impl::general_work (int noutput_items,                                 gr_vector_int &amp;ninput_items,                                  gr_vector_const_void_star &amp;input_items,                                  gr_vector_void_star &amp;output_items) {     const float *in = (const float *) input_items[0]; float *out = (float *) output_items[0];

for(int i = 0; i &lt; noutput_items; i++) { out[i] = in[i] * in[i]; }

// Tell runtime system how many input items we consumed on     // each input stream. consume_each (noutput_items);

// Tell runtime system how many output items we produced. return noutput_items; } There is one pointer to the input- and one pointer to the output buffer, respectively, and a for-loop which copies the square of the input buffer to the output buffer.

Using CMake
If you've never used CMake before, this is a good time to give it a try. The typical workflow of a CMake-based project as seen from the command line is this (if using PyBOMBS, first read Build Tree vs. Install Tree):

$ mkdir build   # We're currently in the module's top directory $ cd build/ $ cmake ../     # Tell CMake that all its config files are one dir up $ make           # And start building (should work after the previous section)

If using GR v3.9 you will need to run: $ sudo make install

Build Tree vs. Install Tree
When you run cmake, you usually run it in a separate directory (e.g. ). This is the build tree. The path to the install tree is, where   is whatever you specified to CMake during configuration (usually  ) with the   switch. (Note: different versions of Python will either use site-packages or dist-packages; dist-packages is the newer way and most likely for newer OSes and installations.)

If you installed GNU Radio using PyBOMBS, the install tree is located in the  directory set during the initial PyBOMBS configuration. Make sure to add the -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX switch for CMake, so that it will correctly locate your GNU Radio installation. The command should look similar to this:

$ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/prefix-3.8 ../ # should be the configured PyBOMBS target Now we have a new directory  in our module's directory. All the compiling etc. is done in here, so the actual source tree is not littered with temporary files. If we change any CMakeLists.txt files, we should re-run  (although in truth, cmake detects these changes and reruns automatically when you next run  ). During compilation, the libraries are copied into the build tree. Only during installation, files are installed to the install tree, thus making our blocks available to GNU Radio apps.

We write our applications such that they access the code and libraries in the install tree. On the other hand, we want our test code to run on the build tree, where we can detect problems before installation.

Let's try that -- running
Because we wrote the QA code before the C++ code, we can immediately see if what we did was correct.

We use  to run our tests (run this from the   subdirectory, after calling   and  ). This invokes a shell script which sets up the PYTHONPATH environment variable so that our tests use the build tree versions of our code and libraries. It then runs all files which have names of the form qa_*.py and reports the overall success or failure.

There is quite a bit of behind-the-scenes action required to use the non-installed versions of our code (look at the  directory for a cheap thrill.)

If you completed the  block, this should work fine:

gr-howto/build % make test Running tests... Test project /home/braun/tmp/gr-howto/build Start 1: test_howto 1/2 Test #1: test_howto ....................... Passed   0.01 sec Start 2: qa_square_ff 2/2 Test #2: qa_square_ff ..................... Passed   0.38 sec

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 2

Total Test time (real) =  0.39 sec If something fails during the tests, we can dig a little deeper. When we run, we're actually invoking the CMake program  , which has a number of options we can pass to it for more detailed information. Say we forgot to multiply  and so aren't actually squaring the signal. If we just run  or even just , we would get this:

gr-howto/build $ ctest Test project /home/braun/tmp/gr-howto/build Start 1: test_howto 1/2 Test #1: test_howto ....................... Passed   0.02 sec Start 2: qa_square_ff 2/2 Test #2: qa_square_ff .....................***Failed   0.21 sec

50% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 2

Total Test time (real) =  0.23 sec

The following tests FAILED: 2 - qa_square_ff (Failed) Errors while running CTest To find out what happened with our qa_square_ff test, we run. The '-V' flag gives us verbose output and the '-R' flag is a regex expression to only run those tests which match.

gr-howto/build $ ctest -V -R square UpdateCTestConfiguration from :/home/braun/tmp/gr-howto/build/DartConfiguration.tcl UpdateCTestConfiguration from :/home/bruan/tmp/gr-howto/build/DartConfiguration.tcl Test project /home/braun/tmp/gr-howto/build Constructing a list of tests Done constructing a list of tests Checking test dependency graph... Checking test dependency graph end test 2 Start 2: qa_square_ff

2: Test command: /bin/sh &quot;/home/bruan/tmp/gr-howto/build/python/qa_square_ff_test.sh&quot; 2: Test timeout computed to be: 9.99988e+06 2: F 2: ====================================================================== 2: FAIL: test_001_t (__main__.qa_square_ff) 2: -- 2: Traceback (most recent call last): 2:  File &quot;/home/braun/tmp/gr-howto/python/qa_square_ff.py&quot;, line 44, in test_001_t 2:    self.assertFloatTuplesAlmostEqual(expected_result, result_data, 6) 2:  File &quot;/opt/gr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/gr_unittest.py&quot;, line 90, in assertFloatTuplesAlmostEqual 2:    self.assertAlmostEqual (a[i], b[i], places, msg) 2: AssertionError: 9 != -3.0 within 6 places 2: 2: -- 2: Ran 1 test in 0.002s 2: 2: FAILED (failures=1) 1/1 Test #2: qa_square_ff .....................***Failed   0.21 sec

0% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 1

Total Test time (real) =  0.21 sec

The following tests FAILED: 2 - qa_square_ff (Failed) Errors while running CTest This tells us that &quot;9 != -3.0&quot; because we expected the output to be (-3)^2 = 9 but really got the input of -3. We can use this information to go back and fix our block until the tests pass.

We can also put in debug print statements into our QA code on failures, like printing out  and   to compare them to better understand the problem.

More C++ code (but better) - Subclasses for common patterns
allows tremendous flexibility with regard to the consumption of input streams and the production of output streams. Adroit use of  and   (see below) allows variable rate blocks to be built. It is possible to construct blocks that consume data at different rates on each input and produce output at a rate that is a function of the contents of the input data.

On the other hand, it is very common for signal processing blocks to have a fixed relationship between the input rate and the output rate. Many are 1:1, while others have 1:N or N:1 relationships. You must have thought the same thing in the  function of the previous block: if the number of items consumed is identical the number of items produced, why do I have to tell GNU Radio the exact same number twice?

Another common requirement is the need to examine more than one input sample to produce a single output sample. This is orthogonal to the relationship between input and output rate. For example, a non-decimating, non-interpolating FIR filter needs to examine N input samples for each output sample it produces, where N is the number of taps in the filter. However, it only consumes a single input sample to produce a single output. We call this concept &quot;history&quot;, but you could also think of it as &quot;look-ahead&quot;.



gr::sync_block is derived from gr::block and implements a 1:1 block with optional history. Given that we know the input to output rate, certain simplifications are possible. From the implementor's point-of-view, the primary change is that we define a  method instead of. has a slightly different calling sequence; it omits the unnecessary  parameter, and arranges for   to be called on our behalf.

Let's add another block which derives from  and call it. First, we edit  to add another test:

def test_002_square2_ff(self): src_data = (-3, 4, -5.5, 2, 3) expected_result = (9, 16, 30.25, 4, 9) src = blocks.vector_source_f(src_data) sqr = howto.square2_ff dst = blocks.vector_sink_f self.tb.connect(src, sqr, dst) self.tb.run result_data = dst.data self.assertFloatTuplesAlmostEqual(expected_result, result_data, 6) You can see it's the exact same test as before except for the use of.

Then, we use  to add the block files, skipping the QA code (because we already have that):

gr-howto % gr_modtool add -t sync -l cpp square2_ff GNU Radio module name identified: howto Block/code identifier: square2_ff Language: C++ Please specify the copyright holder: Enter valid argument list, including default arguments: Add Python QA code? [Y/n] n Add C++ QA code? [Y/n] n Adding file 'square2_ff_impl.h'... Adding file 'square2_ff_impl.cc'... Adding file 'square2_ff.h'... Editing swig/howto_swig.i... Adding file 'howto_square2_ff.xml'... Editing grc/CMakeLists.txt...

If running GR v3.9+ you will need to bind the new  files to the existing files. gr-howto % gr_modtool bind square2_ff GNU Radio module name identifiedL howto Writing binding code to ./python/bindings/square2_ff_python.cc Writing binding code to ./python/bindings/docstrings/square2_ff_pydoc_template.h

Whenever howto/square2_ff.h is changed,  needs to be run.

The constructor in  is done the same way as before, except for the parent class being.

square2_ff_impl::square2_ff_impl : gr::sync_block(&quot;square2_ff&quot;,                      gr::io_signature::make(1, 1, sizeof (float)),                       gr::io_signature::make(1, 1, sizeof (float))) {}

// [...] skip some lines ...

int square2_ff_impl::work(int noutput_items,                         gr_vector_const_void_star &amp;input_items,                          gr_vector_void_star &amp;output_items) {     const float *in = (const float *) input_items[0]; float *out = (float *) output_items[0];

for(int i = 0; i &lt; noutput_items; i++) { out[i] = in[i] * in[i]; }

// Tell runtime system how many output items we produced. return noutput_items; } The  function is the real difference (also, we don't have a   function any more). We'll look at it in greater detail in the next section.

This gives us fewer things to worry about and less code to write. If the block requires history greater than 1, call  in the constructor or any time the requirement changes.

provides a version of  that handles the history requirement.



is derived from  and implements a N:1 block with optional history.



is derived from  and implements a 1:N block with optional history.

With this knowledge it should be clear that  should be a   with no history.

Now, go back into our build directory and run. Because  added the   block to the necessary CMakeLists.txt files,   is automatically rerun for us and followed by.

Again, running  will spawn a test run with of   which should not fail.

Inside the function
If you're using a sync block (including decimator and interpolator), this is how the skeleton code looks like produced by gr_modtool:

int my_block_name::work(int noutput_items,                     gr_vector_const_void_star &amp;input_items,                      gr_vector_void_star &amp;output_items) {   const float *in = (const float *) input_items[0]; float *out = (float *) output_items[0];

// Do &lt;+signal processing+&gt;

// Tell runtime system how many output items we produced. return noutput_items; } So, given history, vectors, multiple input ports etc., is this really all you need? Yes, it is! Because sync blocks have a fixed output to input rate, all you need to know is the number of output items, and you can calculate how many input items are available.

Example - the adder block: source:gr-blocks/lib/add_XX_impl.cc.t

This block has an unknown number of inputs and variable vector lengths. The number of connected ports can be checked by  and. The outer  loop, which goes over all the available items, goes up to. The number of output items is identical to the number of input items because it is a sync block, and you can trust GNU Radio to have this number of items available. In this case, one item is a vector of samples, but we want to add the individual samples, so the for loop considers that.

Example - interpolation in gr::blocks::unpack_k_bits_bb: source:gr-blocks/lib/unpack_k_bits_bb_impl.cc source

This is a block which picks apart bytes and produces the individual bits. Again, it is unknown at compile time how many bits per byte there are. However, there's a fixed number of output items per input item, so we can simply divide  to get the correct number of input items. It will always be correct because GNU Radio knows the input to output ratio and will make sure that  is always a multiple of this integer ratio.

Example - history in source:gr-digital/lib/diff_phasor_cc_impl.cc

If you use history of length k, GNU Radio will keep k-1 entries of the input buffer instead of discarding them. This means that if GNU Radio tells you the input buffer has N items, it actually has N+k-1 items you may use.

Consider the example above. We need one previous item, so history is set to k=2. If you inspect the for loop closely, you'll find that out of  items,   items are actually read. This is possible because there is an extra item in the input buffer from the history.

After consuming  items, the last entry is not discarded and will be available for the next call of.

Help! My test fails!
Congratulations! If your test fails, your QA code has already paid for itself. Obviously, you want to fix everything before you continue.

You can use the command  (instead of , again, all in your   subdirectory) to get all the output from the tests. You can also use  to only run tests that match REGEX, if you have many tests and want to narrow it down. If you can't figure out the problem from the output of your QA code, put in  statements and show intermediary results.

Making your blocks available in GRC
You can now install your module, but it will not be available in GRC. That's because  can't create valid XML files before you've even written a block. The XML code generated when you call  is just some skeleton code.

Once you've finished writing the block,  has a function to help you create the XML code for you. For the howto example, you can invoke it on the  block by calling For GNURadio ver >= 3.8: gr-howto % gr_modtool makeyaml square2_ff GNU Radio module name identified: howto Warning: This is an experimental feature. Don't expect any magic. Searching for matching files in lib/: Making GRC bindings for lib/square2_ff_impl.cc... Overwrite existing GRC file? [y/N] y

For GNURadio ver. < 3.8: gr-howto % gr_modtool makexml square2_ff GNU Radio module name identified: howto Warning: This is an experimental feature. Don't expect any magic. Searching for matching files in lib/: Making GRC bindings for lib/square2_ff_impl.cc... Overwrite existing GRC file? [y/N] y Note that  creates an invalid GRC file, so we can overwrite that.

In most cases,  can't figure out all the parameters by itself and you will have to edit the appropriate XML or YML file by hand. See Writing the XML file for a block (for 3.7) or Writing the YAML file for a block (for 3.8+) for details.

In this case, because the block is so simple, the XML is actually valid. Have a look at :

Square ff  howto_square_ff [HOWTO] import howto howto.square_ff in    float Perhaps you want to change the autogenerated name to something nicer.

Note: The category name must be enclosed in square brackets to work!

If you do a  from the build directory, you can use the block in GRC. If GRC is already running, you can hit the &quot;Reload Blocks&quot; button in the GRC toolbar; it's a blue circular arrow on the right-hand side. You should now see a &quot;HOWTO&quot; category in the block tree.

There's more: additional -methods
If you've read the gr::block documentation (which you should have), you'll have noticed there are a great number of methods available to configure your block.

Here's some of the more important ones:

If your block needs a history (i.e., something like an FIR filter), call this in the constructor. GNU Radio then makes sure you have the given number of 'old' items available.

The smallest history you can have is 1, i.e., for every output item, you need 1 input item. If you choose a larger value, N, this means your output item is calculated from the current input item and from the N-1 previous input items.

The scheduler takes care of this for you. If you set the history to length N, the first N items in the input buffer include the N-1 previous ones (even though you've already consumed them).

The system needs to know how much data is required to ensure validity in each of the input arrays. As stated before, the  method provides this information, and you must therefore override it anytime you write a   derivative (for sync blocks, this is implicit).

The default implementation of  says there is a 1:1 relationship between   and the requirements for each input stream. The size of the items is defined by  in the constructor of. The sizes of the input and output items can of course differ; this still qualifies as a 1:1 relationship. Of course, if you had this relationship, you wouldn't want to use a !

// default implementation: 1:1 void gr::block::forecast(int noutput_items,                    gr_vector_int &amp;ninput_items_required) {   unsigned ninputs = ninput_items_required.size ; for(unsigned i = 0; i &lt; ninputs; i++) ninput_items_required[i] = noutput_items; } Although the 1:1 implementation worked for, it wouldn't be appropriate for interpolators, decimators, or blocks with a more complicated relationship between   and the input requirements. That said, by deriving your classes from gr::sync_block, gr::sync_interpolator or gr::sync_decimator instead of gr::block, you can often avoid implementing forecast.

When implementing your  routine, it's occasionally convenient to have the run time system ensure that you are only asked to produce a number of output items that is a multiple of some particular value. This might occur if your algorithm naturally applies to a fixed sized block of data. Call  in your constructor to specify this requirement. The default output multiple is 1.

Finalizing your work and installing
First, go through this checklist:


 * Have you written one or more blocks, including QA codes?
 * Does  pass?
 * Are there GRC bindings available (if that's what you want)?

In that case, you can go ahead and install your module. On a Linux machine, this would mean going back to the build directory and calling :

$ cd build/ $ make install # or sudo make install With Ubuntu, you may have to call  as well:

$ sudo ldconfig Otherwise, you'll get an error message that the library you just installed cannot be found.

Sources and sinks
Sources and sinks are derived from. The only thing different about them is that sources have no inputs and sinks have no outputs. This is reflected in the  that are passed to the   constructor. Take a look at [source:gr-blocks/lib/file_source_impl.cc file_source.{h,cc}] and file_sink_impl.{h,cc} for some very straight-forward examples.

Hierarchical blocks
supports skeleton code for hierarchical blocks both in Python and C''++.

~/gr-howto % gr_modtool.py add -t hier -l cpp hierblockcpp_ff GNU Radio module name identified: howto Block/code identifier: hierblockcpp_ff Language: C++ Please specify the copyright holder: Enter valid argument list, including default arguments: Add Python QA code? [Y/n] Add C++ QA code? [y/N] Adding file 'hierblockcpp_ff_impl.h'... Adding file 'hierblockcpp_ff_impl.cc'... Adding file 'hierblockcpp_ff.h'... Editing swig/howto_swig.i... Adding file 'howto_hierblockcpp_ff.xml'... Editing grc/CMakeLists.txt... Using the  switch creates such a block in Python.

Everything at one glance: Cheat sheet for editing modules/components:
Here's a quick list for all the steps necessary to build blocks and out-of-tree modules:


 * 1) Create (do this once per module):
 * 2) Add a block to the module:
 * 3) Create a build directory:
 * 4) Invoke the make process:   (Note that you only have to call cmake if you've changed the CMake files)
 * 5) Invoke the testing:   or   or   for more verbosity
 * 6) Call   or   to generate the xml or yaml file for your blocks. Correct manually if needed.
 * 7) Install (only when everything works and no tests fail):
 * 8) Ubuntu users: reload the libs:
 * 9) Delete blocks from the source tree:
 * 10) Disable blocks by removing them from the CMake files:

Tutorial 3: Writing a signal processing block in Python
Note: Writing signal processing blocks in Python comes with a performance penalty. The most common cause for using Python to write blocks is because you want to quickly prototype something without having to argue with C++.

From the previous tutorials, you already know about blocks and how they work. Lets go through things a bit quicker, and code another squaring block in pure Python, which shall be called.

Adding the test case
So, first of all, we add another test case by editing. Leaving out the test cases for the other two blocks, the QA file now looks like this:

from gnuradio import gr, gr_unittest from gnuradio import blocks import howto_swig from square3_ff import square3_ff

class qa_square_ff (gr_unittest.TestCase):

def setUp (self): self.tb = gr.top_block

def tearDown (self): self.tb = None

# [...] Skipped the other test cases

def test_003_square3_ff (self): src_data = (-3, 4, -5.5, 2, 3) expected_result = (9, 16, 30.25, 4, 9) src = blocks.vector_source_f (src_data) sqr = square3_ff dst = blocks.vector_sink_f self.tb.connect (src, sqr) self.tb.connect (sqr, dst) self.tb.run result_data = dst.data self.assertFloatTuplesAlmostEqual (expected_result, result_data, 6)

if __name__ == '__main__': gr_unittest.main The actual test case looks exactly like the previous ones did, only replacing the block definition with. The only other difference is in the import statements: We are now importing a module called  from which we pull the new block.

Adding the block code
Having put the unit test in place, we add a file called  into the   directory using  :

gr-howto % gr_modtool add -t sync -l python square3_ff GNU Radio module name identified: howto Block/code identifier: square3_ff Language: Python Please specify the copyright holder: Enter valid argument list, including default arguments: Add Python QA code? [Y/n] n Adding file 'square3_ff.py'... Adding file 'howto_square3_ff.xml'... Editing grc/CMakeLists.txt... Remember not to add any QA files as we're using the existing one. Next, edit the new file. It should look a bit like this:

import numpy from gnuradio import gr

class square3_ff(gr.sync_block): &quot; Squaring block &quot; def __init__(self): gr.sync_block.__init__(           self,            name = &quot;square3_ff&quot;,            in_sig = [numpy.float32], # Input signature: 1 float at a time            out_sig = [numpy.float32], # Output signature: 1 float at a time        )

def work(self, input_items, output_items): output_items[0][:] = input_items[0] * input_items[0] # Only works because numpy.array return len(output_items[0]) Some things should immediately stick out:


 * The block class is derived from, just like the C++ version was derived from gr::sync_block
 * It has a constructor where the name and input/output signatures are set and a  function

However, there are some major differences to the C++ version:


 * The input and output signatures are simply defined as a list. Every element contains the item size of that port. So in this case, there is one port per input and one port per output and each has an item size of  (a single-precision float). If you want a port to operate on vectors, define a tuple, e.g. [(numpy.float32, 4), numpy.float32] means there are two ports: The first one is for vectors of 4 floats, the second is for scalar floats.
 * When assigning vectors to, remember to use the   operator. This makes sure Python doesn't rebind the variables or does something clever but guarantees that the data is properly copied
 * and  are numpy arrays, which is why we can do the very simple element-wise multiplication the way it's done here (instead of a list comprehension)
 * No recompiling is necessary for the  (faster development cycles, yay!)
 * For Python code, you must modify the XML or YAML file yourself. See Writing the XML file for a block (for 3.7) or Writing the YAML file for a block (for 3.8+) for details.

Other types of Python blocks
Just like the C++ variant, there are four types of blocks in Python:


 * - The Python version of
 * - The Python version of
 * - The Python version of
 * - The Python version of

Like their C++ versions, these blocks have,  , and   methods you can override. The difference is, the argument list for the work functions is always as shown in the previous example:

def work(self, input_items, output_items): # Do stuff

def general_work(self, input_items, output_items): # Do stuff The number of input/output items is obtained through.

More examples
Check out the QA code for the Python blocks for some good examples:


 * gr-blocks/python/blocks/qa_block_gateway.py

Troubleshooting
This occurs in GRC when attempting to drag a block into a flowgraph. It usually means the  file cooresponding to the block located in the   folder is not filled out. ("..." is a placeholder).

This occurs in GRC when attempting to drag a block into the flowgraph. This is caused by  in your   file. Removing  will fix the error.